• The politics of the “mommy wars” and why women need to stop buying into it
    posted by Julie Erfle at 16 May, 3:30 PM  0 
    Share on Facebook+1Share on Twitter

    “Are you mom enough?”

    This was the cover headline on TIME magazine’s Mother’s Day edition. It was accompanied by a picture of a toddler standing on a chair, breastfeeding from his model-perfect mother.

    Shameless ploy to sell magazines? Of course it was. But we buy it anyway.

    Let’s face it; the “mommy wars” sell. From magazines to books to talk shows and television programs, we just can’t get enough of judging and often times, bashing other mothers’ choices on parenting.

    The TIME article was subtitled, “Why attachment parenting drives some mothers to extremes.” But the article had nothing extremist in it. Instead, it described some mothers’ choices to breastfeed her child(ren) into toddlerhood or to make the decision to quit her job and stay home to take care of her children or to respond to a baby’s cries instead of letting him/her cry it out. Wow, how extreme.

    In reality the article barely touched on individual mother’s choices so much as it described Dr. Bill Sears’ evolving philosophy on parenting and his lucrative business promoting that philosophy. That’s a win-win for Dr. Sears and a win-win for TIME magazine but a huge loss for women.

    Describing attachment parenting as extreme or shaking our heads at women who choose high-powered careers in addition to motherhood is an effective way to pit woman against woman.

    I’ve been on both sides of the working vs. at-home debate, and I can say that neither is optimal or superior to the other. Both come with different sets of challenges, and women would be wise to spend their time uniting around causes that make these challenges easier for women instead of arguing over whether they exist or which one is more difficult.

    Do men argue over these issues? No. In fact no one blinks an eye if a man “chooses” to continue working after his child is born. And if a man chooses to be an at-home dad, most women will applaud him and some may even secretly wish her spouse would do the same thing.

    When it comes to child-rearing, again, men spend little to no time arguing with their male counterparts about whether or not breastfeeding is best or whether or not responding to his six-month-old’s night-time cries means he’s spoiling his child.

    Men tend to weigh the options, decide what they think is best, then do it… end of story. Women tend to weigh their options, decide what’s best, check it over with several other women and a host of publications on the issue, then do it, worry about it, and second-guess it. And perhaps that’s our problem – we second-guess ourselves and other mothers far too often.

    Women tend to believe they bear the solely responsibility for their child(ren)’s outcome. We forget that much of a child’s personality is decided before he/she enters this world. We forget that life’s circumstances may hand us problems we weren’t prepared to deal with. We forget that we are human. We will make mistakes. We can only do the best we can with what we know at this moment in time.

    Doctors and authors and other “experts” have made a mint off of our guilt and worries. And while it’s fine to consult an “expert” or ask advice from another, we need to be more supportive of the choices all women make. Whether it’s the choice to become a mother or the choice to stay at home or the choice to medicate a depressed child, we should rally around each other and the knowledge that mothers, more than doctors or authors, know their child best.

    When we feed into the idea that others know better, we relegate our authority. We must refuse to buy-in to the blame game and judgment game and refuse to give up our choices. Instead, we must fight for them, unite behind them and advance the power that is motherhood.

  • Azcvoices.com is a network of community bloggers created by The Arizona Republic, azcentral.com and 12 News to highlight diverse viewpoints. Members' opinions do not represent the views of Republic Media.
  • Recent Arizona Politics Posts

  • More Posts by Julie Erfle

    Julie Erfle

    Post Author: Julie Erfle

    Bio: The story behind this blog begins in 2007 when, on an ordinary September morning, my world was unexpectedly smashed to pieces. A drugged-up gang banger with multiple arrests and outstanding warrants crossed my husband’s path. As my husband and his partner attempted to arrest him, he pulled a gun and shot my husband twice in the back of the head. The murder of a Phoenix police officer is big news. Bigger still is the fact that this happened at the hands of a previously deported illegal immigrant in a border state rife with contentious immigration battles. As I listened to the politicians and pundits spin my husband’s death to further their interests, my journalism background came into focus and I found myself doing my own research into the causes and possible solutions to our nation’s immigration problems. I also gained an awareness of what it was like to be on the opposite side of the lens. I had been a member of the media, and now my family was the subject of the story. When I went public with my views on immigration, I was drawn even further into the political web of Arizona politics, and though I shied away for a time, I felt I could no longer be silent. And so I created this blog, my editorial on the challenges facing our state and our nation. My expectation is that it will be used as a source of reasoned debate to elevate our discussions in a thoughtful and informed manner while seeking solutions to complex problems. I hope the differing opinions expressed by myself and others will both challenge and motivate individuals to work for the greater good.

    Website: http://politicsuncuffed.com/

    Users of this site agree to the Terms of Service, Privacy Policy/Your California Privacy Rights and Ad Choices